Wouldn’t it be great if you could resolve conflicts without stepping into a courtroom, avoiding years of delays, endless paperwork, and hefty legal costs?
When you’re in a dispute, you’re already stressed. But on top of the original problem, you have to deal with the slow, confusing, and expensive drain of the legal system. It often feels like the process of solving the conflict is worse than the conflict itself.
But what if there was a way to find a solution without losing your voice in the process? What if you could stay in the driver's seat?
That is exactly where you can use the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) method, covered by law. It provides a faster, more flexible, and collaborative approach to resolving disputes.
Whether you are facing a business disagreement, family matter, or cross-border commercial issue, ADR provides solutions that save time, money, and relationships.
Let’s explore how ADR works, its different types, and most importantly, by the end of the article you will get to know which is the best option for you.
What is Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)?
ADR is the process of resolving disputes outside the traditional court system. It is cooperative methods that allows parties to work together to find a mutually acceptable outcome.
What are the Common Types of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)?
There are different types of alternative dispute resolution, but the most common types of alternative dispute resolution are:
Arbitration
Mediation
Conciliation
In all three methods, a third party is involved in resolving disputes. Let’s understand each type in detail.
What are the Major Benefits of ADR
- Reduces burden on courts
- Saves costs and time
- Preserves relationships
- Provides flexible, confidential solutions
There are different types of ADR that could help you resolve your dispute without stepping into court.
What is Arbitration?
If you’re in a dispute but don’t want to go to court, you and the other person can choose to take the case to arbitration. This means you both agree to let one or more neutral people (called arbitrators) listen to your side and make a final decision on your behalf, that too faster than court.
This process usually follows rules that both sides agreed to while drafting the provisions of their commercial contract.
Arbitration is a private, flexible, and often faster process to resolve disputes than going to court. There are different ADR methods to resolve the conflict, but the aim is always to solve the problem fairly and mutually.
Types of Arbitration
There are five types of arbitration as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:
Domestic Arbitration: Domestic arbitration is a process when disputes within the same country are resolved by an arbitrator instead of a court, and the decision is legally binding. It saves time and money compared to lengthy court trials.
International Commercial Arbitration: It is used when one party is from another country. This process is governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which helps to settle cross-border business disputes fairly.
Ad hoc Arbitration: In Ad hoc arbitration, disputant parties handle the arbitration themselves by choosing arbitrators and rules, making it a cheaper and more flexible option. However, it may lack administrative support if disagreements arise.
Institutional Arbitration: A specialized arbitral institution manages the process with set rules, procedures, and support for consistency and efficiency. It ensures professionalism and credibility through recognized global institutions like the ICC, LCIA, and SIAC.
Fast-Track Arbitration: A quicker process with a single arbitrator, written submissions, and a strict six-month deadline for the final award. It’s best suited for simple disputes that need speedy resolution.
What is the Process of Arbitration?
Here is the process of Arbitration in simple steps:
1. Arbitration Agreement or Clause
Parties involved in the dispute must have an arbitration clause in their contract clarifying that the dispute will be resolved by arbitration.
2. Invocation and Notice
To initiate the arbitration process during a dispute, the aggrieved party should formally invoke an arbitration by sending an arbitration notice to the opposite party.
3. Appointment of Arbitrator(s)
There should be a specified procedure in the agreement to appoint an arbitrator. In case the consensus is not reached, the courts can intervene and appoint the arbitrator as per the statutory guidelines.
4. Preliminary Hearing and Setting Procedure
A preliminary hearing will take place to decide the timelines, procedural rules, and the scope of arbitration. This sets out the framework for how the proceedings will be managed.
5. Statement of Claims and Defense
The claimant will submit a statement outlining the dispute and relief sought. The respondent can submit a defense and counterclaim, which is supported by relevant evidence and arguments.
6. Hearing of Parties and Evidence
During the hearing, both parties present their evidence, such as documentary records, witness testimony, and expert opinions. The hearing may be oral or just documentary, which depends on agreed procedures.
7. Arbitral Award
Once the hearing is complete, the arbitrator decides and issues the award, which is a binding decision to resolve the dispute. The award can be appealed in higher courts only on limited grounds (like procedural irregularities or bias).
8. Execution/Enforcement of Award
The arbitral award will work like a court decree. Indian courts facilitate enforcement unless grounds for refusal exist under the law.
What is Mediation?
Mediation is a type of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) where a neutral third party helps parties involved in a dispute to reach a mutually acceptable settlement of their conflict outside of a formal court process.
The mediator is different from an arbitrator or a judge, as the mediator does not make a decision, but facilitates communication. It helps each party understand their interests and guides them in creating their own solutions. It preserves relationships and maintains party control over the outcome.
What are the Types of Mediation?
Facilitative Mediation - The mediator here guides the parties to reach their own resolution by following their core interests without giving personal opinions or solutions.
Court-Mandated Mediation – If the court wants a quick and inexpensive settlement, it may decide to impose a mandate on it. The settlement through court order is low if parties and their attorneys are unwilling to participate. But the settlement rate is higher when the parties see advantages of participating in the process.
Evaluative Mediation – In this process, the mediator offers opinions by assessing the legal strengths, which are often used in court-ordered cases by subject-matter experts.
Transformative Mediation – A transformative mediator focuses on empowering parties to resolve their conflict and encouraging them to recognize each other’s needs and interests.
Med-Arb – In med-arb, disputants first agree on the process itself. In this process, parties agree on a condition that the outcome of the process will be binding, which is generally missing from other mediations. Then they try to resolve their dispute with the help of a mediator.
E-mediation – When the parties involved in a dispute are located in distant places or unable to meet due to intense conflict, mediation could be conducted online, which is useful for both parties.
What is the Process of Mediation?
Here’s the complete process of mediation:
1. Introduction and Opening Statement
The first step involves the mediator introducing themselves, outlining their qualifications, and explaining the mediation process, its advantages, and the ground rules. Then the parties and counsel introduce themselves. The mediator hopes to reach a mutual conclusion and address each party's concerns.
2. Joint Session
The process begins when each party presents its case. It begins with the plaintiff, followed by their counsel, and then the defendant and their counsel do the same. The mediator facilitates communication, gathers relevant information, and identifies areas of agreement and disagreement.
3. Separate Sessions (Caucus)
After the joint session, the mediator meets each party separately and confidentially to explore the dispute in more detail and try to figure out the underlying interests. It offers space for parties to disclose sensitive information they may not share jointly. Thereafter, it tests parties' perception and helps to reach a consensus.
4. Reaching a Settlement
The mediator facilitates negotiations and helps each party to understand realities and flexibly adjust positions. It may have multiple private and joint sessions until a mutually acceptable agreement is reached. If no settlement is possible, then the mediator informs the referral court to resume standard proceedings.
5. Closing
When the mediation concludes, the parties then reconvene to confirm orally and then formally document and sign the agreement. The mediator thanks the parties for their cooperation.
In case no agreement occurs, then confidentiality is maintained, and the case returns to court with a note that states it was unresolved.
What is Conciliation?
Conciliation is a voluntary, confidential method to resolve conflicts between disputing parties. In conciliation, a neutral third party, the conciliator, helps the disputants to reach a mutually agreeable settlement by facilitating communication, identifying issues, and offering non-binding settlement proposals.
This alternative dispute resolution (ADR) method is more formal than litigation or arbitration, and its goal is to preserve long-term relationships by finding a creative, amicable solution to the conflict.
What are the Types of Conciliation?
There are mainly two types of conciliation:
Voluntary Conciliation - Voluntary conciliation helps parties to resolve their dispute with the help of a conciliator. The outcome of this process is not legally binding, and the parties can withdraw at any time.
Compulsory Conciliation - On the other hand, compulsory conciliation is binding, and participation is required by law, regulation, or contractual agreement. It generally comes into existence when voluntary efforts fail or are not undertaken.
What is the Process of Conciliation?
Here is the simple process of conciliation:
1. Commencement of Conciliation
The conciliation process begins when one party sends the written invitation to the other. The proceeding starts if the other party accepts the conciliation offer, and if the other party does not respond within 30 days, it is treated as a rejection.
2. Appointment of Conciliators
Once both disputants agreed to conciliation, they appointed a conciliator. They can also choose to appoint one conciliator chosen jointly, two conciliators (one appointed by each party), or three conciliators when each party appoints one and both agree on a presiding conciliator.
3 Submission of Written Statements
Once the conciliator is appointed, both parties are required to submit their written statements explaining the facts of the case. These statements must be shared with the other party to ensure transparency.
4. Conduct of Proceedings
Once the conciliator understands each party's point of view, they will communicate with the parties either in writing or orally. Thereafter, they may hold a separate or joint session, depending on the situation, to ensure proceedings are completed flexibly.
5. Administrative Assistance
If required, the conciliator or the parties can seek help from an institution or individual to manage administrative tasks that require the consent of both parties.
Difference Between Arbitration Conciliation and Mediation
Here are the key differences between arbitration, mediation and conciliation:
Factors | Arbitration | Mediation | Conciliation |
Definition | A legal process where a neutral third party (arbitrator) makes a binding decision. | A voluntary process where a mediator facilitates negotiation between parties. | A non-binding process where a conciliator actively assists parties to resolve disputes. |
Third Party Role | An arbitrator acts like a private judge and makes a decision. | The mediator facilitates communication but doesn’t suggest solutions. | Conciliator suggests possible solutions and offers settlement proposals. |
Binding Nature | Yes, usually binding and enforceable like a court judgment. | No, only binding if the parties agree to the settlement. | No, unless the parties agree to the settlement terms. |
Formality | Formal process with legal procedures similar to a court. | Informal and flexible. | Less formal than arbitration, but more involved than mediation. |
Decision Maker | The arbitrator decides the outcome. | Parties decide the outcome. | Parties decide, but with guidance from a conciliator. |
Legal Standing | Governed by laws like the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. | Not strictly legal; based on mutual consent. | Recognized legally but less formal than arbitration. |
Cost | More expensive than mediation and conciliation. | Generally low cost. | Cost-effective. |
Time Taken | It can be time-consuming. | Relatively quick. | Usually quick. |
Privacy | Generally private and confidential. | Highly confidential. | Confidential process. |
Use in Court | Can be used as an alternative to litigation; awards are enforceable. | Often used to avoid court altogether. | It can be a pre-litigation step or an out-of-court settlement method. |
Legal Procedures and Important Sections
There are different types of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in India. The three key methods are arbitration, conciliation, and mediation, which the Civil Procedure Code governs, 1908 (Section 89), the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, among others.
Here's a quick overview of each law and important sections playing a key role in resolving disputes.
1. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Primarily, all alternative disputes are governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This act enforces arbitration agreements, conducts arbitral proceedings, and enforces arbitral awards. It deals with all domestic and international arbitration and also sets procedures to deal with conciliation.
2. Civil Procedure Code (CPC), 1908
Section 89 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, also encourages people to resolve their disputes through arbitration, conciliation, and mediation. It allows courts to refer civil disputes to out-of-court settlements instead of traditional litigation if both parties agree.
3. The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, lays the foundation of legal aid in India and created the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) to regulate legal aid in India. This act introduces the concept of Lok Adalats, which is effective in resolving family disputes, property disputes, and labour disputes.
4. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019
If you are a consumer and involved in any tussle with a merchant, then the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, comes into force and will protect your rights. It will help you resolve your disputes through mediation and online dispute resolution (ODR). It also established the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions, which encourage ADR as an alternative to litigation.
5. UNCITRAL Model Law
If there is any dispute that includes any foreign person or company, then this dispute will be resolved with the help of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. This helps India play a key role in international arbitration by attracting global businesses with smooth arbitration clauses and procedures.
What are the Key Factors to Keep in Mind While Selecting ADR?
Here are some factors to keep in mind while selecting ADR:
👉 Nature of Dispute: If you are stuck in any complex legal or technical issues, then you can go with arbitration, or if there are any emotional or relational conflicts involved, then it is better to resolve the matter by mediation.
👉 Relationship Preservation: If you believe maintaining ongoing relationships is crucial (e.g., workplace, business partnerships), then adopting a collaborative process, such as mediation or negotiation, is advisable.
👉 Confidentiality Needs: If the information between disputants is highly sensitive and confidentiality is crucial, mediation or negotiation may be preferable to arbitration.
👉 Speed and Cost: The most common problems between disputants are the cost and time involved with ADR methods. If you want a faster and cheaper solution, then go with negotiation followed by mediation and arbitration.
👉 Finality/Binding Decision: To make sure the decision is binding, it is better to go with arbitration, as mediation and negotiation are non-binding.
👉 Expertise of Neutral: There are some cases that are very critical in technicality and require specialized knowledge to deal with disputes; in such cases, it is better to go with the arbitration process, as it allows parties to select decision makers with industry expertise.
Landmark Judgements on Alternative Dispute Resolution in India
1. J&K State Forest Corporation v. Abdul Karim Wani (1989)
- Issue: Who has the authority to appoint an arbitrator, and where should jurisdictional challenges be raised?
- Judgment: The Supreme Court held that the Chief Justice has administrative powers to appoint arbitrators under Section 11. Jurisdictional objections must be raised before the arbitral tribunal (Section 16), not directly in courts.
- Takeaway: Arbitration is a self-contained mechanism; courts cannot be bypassed for jurisdictional objections.
2. Bhatia International v. Bulk Trading SA (2002)
- Issue: Does Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, apply to foreign-seated arbitrations?
- Judgment: The Court held that Part I applies even to foreign arbitrations unless parties explicitly exclude it.
- Takeaway: Extended Indian arbitration law to foreign-seated arbitrations, increasing judicial intervention.
3. Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc. (BALCO Case, 2012)
- Issue: Should Indian courts intervene in foreign-seated arbitrations under Part I of the Act?
- Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled Part I does not apply to foreign-seated arbitrations, overturning Bhatia International.
- Takeaway: Reduced judicial interference, aligned India with international arbitration standards, and made India arbitration-friendly.
Not every dispute belongs in a courtroom. Many can be resolved more efficiently through arbitration, mediation, or conciliation—saving time, money, and relationships in the process. The real challenge, however, is deciding which ADR method suits your unique situation.
This is where DigiLawyer.ai becomes valuable. Think of it as your digital legal guide—it helps you assess your case, understand your options, and navigate the ADR process step by step.
FAQ's Related to Alternate Dispute Resolution
Civil, commercial, family, labor, and business disputes usually can be resolved via ADR if parties agree to participate.
Most ADR proceedings are confidential; information disclosed is not admissible in court if the process fails.
Most ADR proceedings are confidential; information disclosed is not admissible in court if the process fails.
Yes, ADR is legally recognized in India with specific laws governing arbitration, mediation, and conciliation.
Costs are usually shared between parties or according to prior agreement.
Consider dispute type, urgency, costs, desired outcome bindingness, confidentiality, and relationship preservation. You can also reach out to DigiLawyer's experts who will guide you step by step.
Look for mediators with relevant experience and training in your dispute type. Use recommendations from legal professionals, ADR organizations, or mediation centers.
nsure neutrality, good communication skills, and mutual agreement among parties. Many ADR organizations provide qualified mediator lists for appointments. Consider mediator availability, fees, and whether virtual mediation is an option.
ADR is often faster, more flexible, and cost-effective, and it preserves confidentiality and relationships better than litigation.
Disclaimer: DigiLawyer is not a law firm, a substitute for a lawyer or law firm, a chartered accountancy firm, or a company secretary firm. We act solely as an intermediary between users and registered professionals, and also offer AI-powered legal assistance, consultation, and document drafting tools to improve access to legal support. Use of our website, services, or AI tools is at the sole risk of the user and does not create any lawyer-client or professional relationship. All consultations and interactions facilitated through our platform are strictly between the user and independent professionals. DigiLawyer is not liable for any actions, decisions, or outcomes arising from the use of our platform, AI tools, or reliance on any advice, consultation, or content provided by us or third-party professionals.
Use of our products and services is subject to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Service
